31:T612,md`The risk of confusing readers about the ultimate outcome of the race can be seen in the New York Times page reporting results from California's 10th Congressional District. On Wednesday, November 7, the day after polls closed, this is how the page appeared, according to a snapshot taken by the [Internet Archive](https://web.archive.org/web/20181107205804/https://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/california-house-district-10). I've added a red box to emphasize how precincts reporting were described. ![Before](https://gist.githubusercontent.com/palewire/d653820292a4825f647f4a32b1fe118c/raw/05ed45fc82ea95f864623af7f1b2f1aad0f035d1/before.png) [A week later](https://web.archive.org/web/20181114171358/https://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/california-house-district-10), after 75,000 more provisional and vote-by-mail ballots had been counted, the result reversed. The precincts reporting figure, which I've emphasized again, is unchanged. Some observers believe this contributes to public confusion, or at least is an imperfection in the report. ![After](https://gist.github.com/palewire/d653820292a4825f647f4a32b1fe118c/raw/05ed45fc82ea95f864623af7f1b2f1aad0f035d1/after.png) This display is commonplace, including on the competing tables I personally produced [at the Los Angeles Times](http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-pol-na-us-general-election-results-2018/). I point it out on the New York Times because its pages are well preserved by the Internet Archive, and I consider the NYT to be the gold standard in information graphics.`32:T68a,html`

Candidate	Party	Votes	Pct.
Jeff Denham*	Republican	56,701	50.6%
Josh Harder	Democrat	55,414	49.4%

112,115 votes, 100% reporting (478 of 478 precincts)

* Incumbent

`33:T7dc,html` `34:[] 2f:{"title":"Election results challenge: Precincts reporting","cells":[{"id":0,"value":"md`# Election results challenge: Precincts reporting\n\nA week after the 2018 midterm elections, U.S. officials are still counting ballots. A handful of close races remain undecided.\n\nIn states like California, the increasing number of provisional and mail-in ballots tallied following Election Day has made the outcome after the initial round of results less certain. News consumers, used to decisive calls after polls close, need to be informed that tight races will now take days or weeks to be finalized.\n\n[Voices](https://twitter.com/B_M_Finnigan/status/1062591693722017794) in the news media are calling for a reform of how television broadcasters and online publishers commonly describe \"precincts reporting.\" Typically this number refers exclusively to votes collected at polling places and counted on Election Day. It entirely ignores the pile of votes, increasing each year, that must be counted in the days that follow.`","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs"},{"id":48,"value":"$31","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs"},{"id":50,"value":"md`### Got a better idea? Here's you chance to prove it\n\nRather than complain, let's come up with something better. I've created a simplified version of the New York Times table from the day after the election below using the excellent tools available here at Observable.\n\n**Your challenge:** Fork this page, [use Observable's new merge feature](https://beta.observablehq.com/@observablehq/fork-share-merge), and suggest some changes. The best submission will earn a free lunch with the Los Angeles Times Data Desk at the [upcoming NICAR conference in Newport Beach](https://www.ire.org/events-and-training/event/3433/). \n`","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs"},{"id":60,"value":"$32","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs"},{"id":115,"value":"md`### Let's see it!`","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs"},{"id":62,"value":"$33","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs"}],"files":"$W34","stdlib":"1","titling":"auto"}